[Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#842675: Bug#842675: Bug#842675: lightdm FTBFS on mips, mipsel and mips64el: error: symbols mismatch
- Subject: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#842675: Bug#842675: Bug#842675: lightdm FTBFS on mips, mipsel and mips64el: error: symbols mismatch
- From: corsac at debian.org (Yves-Alexis Perez)
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 15:15:47 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1479564947.2465.40.camel@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <1477918842.3456.6.camel@debian.org>
- References: <20382C9C3AC3924DB9A29D43AA437435528DED0A@BADAG02.ba.imgtec.org> <1477918842.3456.6.camel@debian.org>
On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 14:00 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 10:34 +0000, Radovan Birdic wrote:
> > The problem is in liblightdm-qt-3-0.symbols where these symbols are
> > missing.
> >
> > I have created and attached a patch that adds missing symbols into this
> > file
> > and resolves this issue.
> > With this patch package builds successfully on mips*, i386 and amd64
> > architectures.
>
> I have to admit I'm not really comfortable *removing* symbols from a file
> just
> for some architectures. It looks weird to me that it would only happen on
> those arches. Maybe something changed in Qt but I'm highly puzzled here.
>
Well, as assumed, the build fails on i386/amd64 with the updated symbols file.
I might be able to provide multiple symbols file but it does look weird in any
case.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xfce-devel/attachments/20161119/4520da33/attachment.sig>
Reply to: