[Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#732035: Bug#732035: Bug#732035: thunar: Unable to mount USB drives with Thunar
- Subject: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#732035: Bug#732035: Bug#732035: thunar: Unable to mount USB drives with Thunar
- From: corsac at debian.org (Yves-Alexis Perez)
- Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:36:23 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1407227783.27440.15.camel@scapa>
- In-reply-to: <1386885917.24372.47.camel@scapa>
- References: <20131212185331.20356.34461.reportbug@lunchbox> <1386881913.24372.42.camel@scapa> <baa2cb1db0bc39451ba3b0231c6c17b6.squirrel@tarcanfel.net> <1386885917.24372.47.camel@scapa>
On jeu., 2013-12-12 at 23:05 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Please keep the bug on CC:
>
> On jeu., 2013-12-12 at 15:48 -0600, Jonathan Hutchins wrote:
> > > On jeu., 2013-12-12 at 12:53 -0600, Jonathan Hutchins wrote:
> > >> Dec 12 12:47:36 lunchbox kernel: [590857.210653] Thunar[20344]:
> > >> segfault at 0 ip b6c2b020 sp bfdee058 error 4 in
> > >> libglib-2.0.so.0.3200.4[b6bb5000+fb000]
> > >
> > > That doesn't look to good, could you take a backtrace?
> >
> > I would, but I'm not a developer and don't know the procedure.
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/HowToGetABacktrace
>
> > This is
> > also supposed to be a simple, minimal system (hence xfce instead of gnome)
> > and does not have a debugging/development environment installed. If
> > there's a writeup of the steps necessary to do this and it doesn't involve
> > a full development setup, please send me a link and I'll give it a try.
> >
> Well, you'll need to install debugging packages for Thunar and the
> various libraries involved (libglib, libgtk, libxfce4util, libxfce4ui at
> least). Then gdb attach to the thunar process, and make it crash.
>
Any news on this. Does it still happen with current Thunar versions?
--
Yves-Alexis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xfce-devel/attachments/20140805/933c5218/attachment-0001.sig>
Reply to: