[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#747159: Processed: Re: Bug#742829

On Tue, 2014 May  6 11:32+0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Note that the ?destination? maintainers don't get a copy of your mail
> when you reassign a bug, so it's usually a good idea to add them to
> CC: for that mail.

Thanks; as you probably noticed, I'm still new to BTS control-fu :]

> About the issue itself, feel free to provide a patch for the
> integrated AppArmor profile. Note that this profile is intended for
> the lightdm ?guest? session support, which is not yet available by
> default on Debian (but that doesn't mean we can't fix it).

A patch would be fairly simple:

--- /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/lightdm_chromium-browser.orig	2014-04-28 15:33:22.000000000 -0400
+++ /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/lightdm_chromium-browser	2014-05-06 16:40:08.014693614 -0400
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 # abstractions/lightdm, this abstraction must be separate from
 # abstractions/lightdm.
-  /usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser Cx -> chromium_browser,
+  /usr/lib/chromium/chromium Cx -> chromium_browser,
   profile chromium_browser {
     # Allow all the same accesses as other applications in the guest session
     #include <abstractions/lightdm>
@@ -29,5 +29,5 @@
     /selinux/ r,
-    /usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser-sandbox ix,
+    /usr/lib/chromium/chrome-sandbox ix,

Given that this also comes from Ubuntu-land, however, intrigeri's
suggestion of parameterizing the profiles with tunables is looking all
the better.

Reply to: