[Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#744025: xfce4-panel: Clock positioning behaviour regression upgrading from wheezy to jessie
- Subject: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#744025: xfce4-panel: Clock positioning behaviour regression upgrading from wheezy to jessie
- From: zen75502 at zen.co.uk (Martin Read)
- Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 13:09:01 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 5345385D.9010901@zen.co.uk>
Package: xfce4-panel
Version: 4.10.1-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
On upgrading from wheezy to jessie, it appears that the positioning
behaviour of the Clock, Notification Area, and Workspace Switcher
elements in the XFCE panel has changed from right-aligned to left-aligned.
As a result, instead of the Clock being in a predictable fixed position
at the extreme bottom right of my screen where I am accustomed to
finding it, it now moves back and forth across the bottom of the screen
as I open and close application windows (which changes the width of the
Window Buttons element).
There is no visible means within the XFCE panel configuration utility of
reinstating the previous behaviour.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages xfce4-panel depends on:
ii exo-utils 0.10.2-3
ii libatk1.0-0 2.10.0-2
ii libc6 2.18-4
ii libcairo2 1.12.16-2
ii libdbus-1-3 1.8.0-3
ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.102-1
ii libexo-1-0 0.10.2-3
ii libfontconfig1 2.11.0-2
ii libfreetype6 2.5.2-1
ii libgarcon-1-0 0.2.1-1
ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.30.6-1
ii libglib2.0-0 2.38.2-5
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.22-1
ii libice6 2:1.0.8-2
ii libpango1.0-0 1.36.3-1
ii libsm6 2:1.2.1-2
ii libwnck22 2.30.7-1
ii libx11-6 2:1.6.2-1
ii libxext6 2:1.3.2-1
ii libxfce4ui-1-0 4.10.0-5
ii libxfce4util6 4.10.1-1
ii libxfconf-0-2 4.10.0-2
ii multiarch-support 2.18-4
xfce4-panel recommends no packages.
xfce4-panel suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Reply to: