[Pkg-xfce-devel] exo_0.6.2-3_amd64.changes is NEW
- Subject: [Pkg-xfce-devel] exo_0.6.2-3_amd64.changes is NEW
- From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters)
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:17:21 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] E1RGU9B-0002us-2C@franck.debian.org>
exo-utils-dbg_0.6.2-3_amd64.deb
to main/e/exo/exo-utils-dbg_0.6.2-3_amd64.deb
exo-utils_0.6.2-3_amd64.deb
to main/e/exo/exo-utils_0.6.2-3_amd64.deb
exo_0.6.2-3.debian.tar.gz
to main/e/exo/exo_0.6.2-3.debian.tar.gz
exo_0.6.2-3.dsc
to main/e/exo/exo_0.6.2-3.dsc
libexo-1-0-dbg_0.6.2-3_amd64.deb
to main/e/exo/libexo-1-0-dbg_0.6.2-3_amd64.deb
libexo-1-0_0.6.2-3_amd64.deb
to main/e/exo/libexo-1-0_0.6.2-3_amd64.deb
libexo-1-dev_0.6.2-3_amd64.deb
to main/e/exo/libexo-1-dev_0.6.2-3_amd64.deb
libexo-common_0.6.2-3_all.deb
to main/e/exo/libexo-common_0.6.2-3_all.deb
(new) libexo-helpers_0.6.2-3_amd64.deb optional libs
libexo helpers
This package contains the helper files in use by exo library for its
preferred applications framework.
Changes: exo (0.6.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Yves-Alexis Perez ]
* debian/NEW: fix typo, thanks to Cyril Brulebois.
.
[ Lionel Le Folgoc ]
* Split exo helpers into their own package libexo-helpers, as some of them
use architecture dependent paths. closes: #645420
* debian/control: drop spurious priority of libexo-common.
Override entries for your package:
exo-utils-dbg_0.6.2-3_amd64.deb - extra debug
exo-utils_0.6.2-3_amd64.deb - optional xfce
exo_0.6.2-3.dsc - source libs
libexo-1-0-dbg_0.6.2-3_amd64.deb - extra debug
libexo-1-0_0.6.2-3_amd64.deb - optional libs
libexo-1-dev_0.6.2-3_amd64.deb - optional libdevel
libexo-common_0.6.2-3_all.deb - extra libs
Announcing to debian-devel-changes at lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 645420
Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of
the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New
packages are usually added to the override file about once a week.
You may have gotten the distribution wrong. You'll get warnings above
if files already exist in other distributions.
Reply to: