[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#636131: lightdm: does not allow to choose 'Xclient script' session



Package: lightdm
Version: 0.9.2-2
Severity: normal

I run a custom session started by ~/.xsession.  On gdm, one can select
"run Xclient script" as the session to launch, which results in that
script being run. lightdm does not seem to offer this option, but
allows only to choose between sessions registered via .desktop files
in /usr/share/xsessions.  I'd very much appreciate lightdm supporting
~/.xsession scripts as well, as it is otherwise unsuitable for people
having customized their session that way.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_AT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages lightdm depends on:
ii  adduser                       3.113      add and remove users and groups
ii  consolekit                    0.4.5-1    framework for defining and trackin
ii  dbus                          1.4.14-1   simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]         1.5.41     Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                         2.13-13    Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libglib2.0-0                  2.28.6-1   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libpam0g                      1.1.3-2    Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libxcb1                       1.7-3      X C Binding
ii  libxdmcp6                     1:1.1.0-3  X11 Display Manager Control Protoc
ii  lightdm-gtk-greeter           0.9.2-2    simple display manager (GTK+ greet

Versions of packages lightdm recommends:
ii  xserver-xorg                  1:7.6+7    X.Org X server

lightdm suggests no packages.

-- debconf information:
  lightdm/daemon_name: /usr/sbin/lightdm
* shared/default-x-display-manager: lightdm






Reply to: