[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#612504: Bug#612504: Bug#612504: xfce4-session: Attempted suspend



On Tue, 17 May 2011 08:18:45 +0200
Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac at debian.org> wrote:

> That looks like some app in the session doesn't respond correctly. Try
> to quit everything (including stuff in the systray) and provide the
> list of running processes for your users before hitting the logout
> button. 

------------------------------------------------------
ps -U frank

  PID TTY          TIME CMD
 3421 ?        00:00:02 notification-da
12614 tty1     00:00:00 bash
13144 tty2     00:00:00 bash
13431 tty2     00:00:00 ps
14222 ?        00:00:00 ck-launch-sessi
14233 ?        00:00:00 sh
14270 ?        00:00:00 ssh-agent
14273 ?        00:00:00 dbus-launch
14274 ?        00:00:07 dbus-daemon
14282 ?        00:00:00 xfconfd
14288 ?        00:00:07 xscreensaver
14290 ?        00:00:06 xfce4-session
14295 ?        00:04:23 xfwm4
14297 ?        00:00:00 xfsettingsd
14298 ?        00:00:06 xfdesktop
14301 ?        00:00:07 xfdesktop
14303 ?        00:00:45 xfce4-panel
14304 ?        00:00:08 xfdesktop
14305 ?        00:00:06 xfdesktop
14306 ?        00:00:00 xfce4-power-man
14307 ?        00:00:01 xfce4-settings-
14313 ?        00:00:02 xfce4-places-pl
14321 ?        00:00:00 gvfsd
14327 ?        00:00:00 gvfs-fuse-daemo
14344 ?        00:00:00 gvfsd-trash
14371 ?        00:00:00 xfce4-volumed
14375 ?        00:00:01 blueman-applet
15056 ?        00:00:00 gvfsd-metadata
24252 ?        00:00:00 gconfd-2
------------------------------------------------------
Blueman-applet is in the systray, but I couldn't stop it.

Not sure why there are four instances of xfdesktop running. 

> Looks like a  Consolekit issue, read README.Debian in xfce4 and
> xfce4-session. Is upower installed, by the way?

Yes

ii  upower       0.9.9-4         abstraction for power management
 
> Not really. Slim has an issue but gdm should work fine.
 
For me, gdm behaves like slim. 






Reply to: