[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#610746: Bug#610746: Bug#610746: xfce4-session crashes at startup after today's apt update



On lun., 2011-01-24 at 16:43 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> I have attached gdb.txt which is a full backtrace generated as
> detailed at http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/XserverDebugging
> although without the benefit of debugging symbols as I did not find an
> xfce4-session-dbg package.  I have also attached the xfce4-session.xml
> configuration that causes the crashes.

Yeah, the backtrace is useless indeed. It'd help if you could install
all the relevant -dbg packages. xfce4-session-dbg doesn't exist so if
you can rebuild it it'd help. I might be able to provide you an
unstriped package but not right now.
> 
> To stop the crashes I remove the following from xfce4-session.xml:
> 
>   <property name="splash" type="empty">
>     <property name="Engine" type="string" value="balou"/>
>     <property name="engines" type="empty">
>       <property name="simple" type="empty">
>         <property name="Font" type="empty"/>
>         <property name="BgColor" type="empty"/>
>         <property name="FgColor" type="empty"/>
>         <property name="Image" type="empty"/>
>       </property>
>       <property name="balou" type="empty">
>         <property name="Theme" type="string" value="Default"/>
>       </property>
>     </property>
>   </property>

It looks fine at first sight. I've tried it (but on 4.8) and it didn't
crash. I'll try it on squeeze and check.

All in all, it doesn't look RC to me since it's doesn't seem to be
really reproducible easily (by selecting the balou theme on squeeze and
sid, at least)

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xfce-devel/attachments/20110125/e1096282/attachment.pgp>



Reply to: