Your message dated Thu, 13 Nov 2025 03:44:21 -0500 with message-id <[🔎] aRWaZQUGvJpeIkoV@prl-debianold-64.jexium-island.net> and subject line Re: Bug#903678: resize vs. xrandr has caused the Debian Bug report #903678, regarding resize vs. xrandr to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 903678: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=903678 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: resize vs. xrandr
- From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 06:41:18 +0800
- Message-id: <87wou0nkkx.fsf@jidanni.org>
Package: xterm Version: 333-1 Severity: wishlist File: /usr/share/man/man1/resize.1.gz Man resize does not mention what to do in the case one does in a running xterm: $ seq 222 $ xrandr --output LVDS-1 --mode 1024x576 $ # mention the correct resize recipe here, so that $ seq 222 # will show 222 at the bottom of the screen too, just like the first time, even thought now there are less rows.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 903678@bugs.debian.org, 903678-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: 903678-submitter@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#903678: resize vs. xrandr
- From: Thomas Dickey <dickey@invisible-island.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 03:44:21 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] aRWaZQUGvJpeIkoV@prl-debianold-64.jexium-island.net>
- Reply-to: dickey@invisible-island.net
- In-reply-to: <87wou0nkkx.fsf@jidanni.org>
- References: <87wou0nkkx.fsf@jidanni.org>
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 06:41:18AM +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > Package: xterm > Version: 333-1 > Severity: wishlist > File: /usr/share/man/man1/resize.1.gz > > Man resize does not mention what to do in the case one does in a running > xterm: > $ seq 222 > $ xrandr --output LVDS-1 --mode 1024x576 > $ # mention the correct resize recipe here, so that > $ seq 222 # will show 222 at the bottom of the screen too, just like the > first time, even thought now there are less rows. man xterm says that's the expected (default) behavior: resizeGravity (class ResizeGravity) Affects the behavior when the window is resized to be taller or shorter. NorthWest specifies that the top line of text on the screen stay fixed. If the window is made shorter, lines are dropped from the bottom; if the window is made taller, blank lines are added at the bottom. This is compatible with the behavior in X11R4. SouthWest (the default) specifies that the bottom line of text on the screen stay fixed. If the window is made taller, additional saved lines will be scrolled down onto the screen; if the window is made shorter, lines will be scrolled off the top of the screen, and the top saved lines will be dropped. i.e., "SouthWest (the default) specifies that the bottom line of text on the screen stay fixed." -- Thomas E. Dickey <dickey@invisible-island.net> https://invisible-island.netAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---