[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#1112158: sway: System freeze after several hours with: Unsupported modifier, resource creation failed solution.



Control: retitle -1 sway: System freeze after several hours with: Unsupported modifier, resource creation failed
Control: reassign -1 sway

On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 at 09:39:30 +1000, JoE wrote:
  System froze after running for several hours.
Log shows error: "debian /usr/libexec/gdm-wayland-session[4073]: Unsupported modifier, resource creation failed." repeatedly.

It looks as though this error message is coming from the Wayland session that was run by gdm (which in this case seems to be sway) rather than from gdm itself, so I'm reassigning this to sway to start with. It might really be an issue in some lower-level component like wlroots or mesa.

Aug 27 07:23:10 debian kernel: i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] Found SANDYBRIDGE (device ID 0126) display version 6.00 stepping N/A

Is this the only GPU in this system: the Intel HD Graphics 3000 integrated GPU that is built-in to a Sandy Bridge (Core 2xxx) CPU?

Aug 27 08:00:16 debian /usr/libexec/gdm-wayland-session[1696]: 00:34:23.246 [ERROR] [wlr] [backend/drm/atomic.c:79] connector LVDS-1: Atomic commit failed: Device or resource busy
Aug 27 08:00:16 debian /usr/libexec/gdm-wayland-session[1696]: 00:34:23.246 [ERROR] [sway/desktop/output.c:317] Page-flip failed on output LVDS-1

These messages from earlier in the session might also be relevant. They occur several times in the log.

Aug 27 08:27:46 debian /usr/libexec/gdm-wayland-session[4073]: Unsupported modifier, resource creation failed.
Aug 27 08:27:46 debian /usr/libexec/gdm-wayland-session[4073]: Unsupported modifier, resource creation failed.

These messages start about an hour after boot in the provided log, and continue, extremely frequently (many times per second), from that point. They come from the crocus or iris driver for Intel GPUs, which is part of Mesa (both drivers contain this message so I can't immediately tell which one was active on this system).

    smcv


Reply to: