[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1073028: marked as done (libsm: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Oct 2024 18:43:51 +0100
with message-id <ZyPB18Oj5vpkQq-7@carotte>
and subject line Re: Bug#1073028: libsm: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format
has caused the Debian Bug report #1073028,
regarding libsm: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1073028: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073028
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: libsm
Version: 2:1.2.3-1
Severity: wishlist

This package is among the few that still use source format 1.0.
Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
advantages, as documented in https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ;
(2) this contributes to standardization of packaging practices.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Closing as wontfix, xorg-team uses 1.0 for non-native packages.

Cheers,
Julien

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 22:54:04 +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:

> Source: libsm
> Version: 2:1.2.3-1
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> This package is among the few that still use source format 1.0.
> Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
> advantages, as documented in https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ;
> (2) this contributes to standardization of packaging practices.
>

--- End Message ---
Reply to: