[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1070815: marked as done (libdrm-intel1 should be compiled for arm64)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2024 15:49:31 +0000
with message-id <E1sH3kZ-005Nui-E7@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1070815: fixed in libdrm 2.4.121-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1070815,
regarding libdrm-intel1 should be compiled for arm64
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1070815: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070815
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libdrm-intel1
Version: 2.4.120-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: civil.over@gmail.com

Dear Maintainer,

   * What led up to the situation?

     I recently got an Ampere Altra board and I've decided to try getting
     Intel Arc 750 working on it. While that requires vendor-specific kernel
     patches (Workaround for Altra's PCIe Errata) and recent kernel
     (6.9.0-rc6 with drm-next/xe), I managed to get it working.

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?

     One of the obstacles I had, was that libdrm-intel1 is not compiled on
     arm64 systems in debian (testing or unstable or experimental). Upstream
     actually have nothing that prevents you from compiling it and only
     requires to add arm64 in control for libdrm-intel1.

   * What was the outcome of this action?

     I've actually managed to build libdrm-intel1 on aarch64.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: arm64 (aarch64)

Kernel: Linux 6.9.0-rc6+ (SMP w/64 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_USER
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages libdrm-intel1 depends on:
ii  libc6          2.38-7
ii  libdrm2        2.4.120-3
ii  libpciaccess0  0.17-3+b1

libdrm-intel1 recommends no packages.

libdrm-intel1 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- patch that I've applied to make it build:
--- libdrm-2.4.120.old/debian/control	2024-02-08 08:49:20.000000000 +0100
+++ libdrm-2.4.120/debian/control	2024-05-09 10:30:48.688180370 +0200
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
 Architecture: linux-any hurd-any
 Depends:
  libdrm2 (= ${binary:Version}),
- libdrm-intel1 (= ${binary:Version}) [amd64 i386 hurd-i386 x32],
+ libdrm-intel1 (= ${binary:Version}) [arm64 amd64 i386 hurd-i386 x32],
  libdrm-radeon1 (= ${binary:Version}),
  libdrm-nouveau2 (= ${binary:Version}) [linux-any],
  libdrm-amdgpu1 (= ${binary:Version}),
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
  This is a udeb, or a microdeb, for the debian-installer.

 Package: libdrm-intel1
-Architecture: amd64 i386 hurd-i386 x32
+Architecture: arm64 amd64 i386 hurd-i386 x32
 Depends:
  ${shlibs:Depends},
  ${misc:Depends},

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: libdrm
Source-Version: 2.4.121-2
Done: Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libdrm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1070815@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton@debian.org> (supplier of updated libdrm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 18:26:23 +0300
Source: libdrm
Built-For-Profiles: noudeb
Architecture: source
Version: 2.4.121-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force <debian-x@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton@debian.org>
Closes: 1070815
Changes:
 libdrm (2.4.121-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * rules: Enable intel on arm64. (Closes: #1070815)
Checksums-Sha1:
 976e3e36052f7663a7db5921c995607717fab7bd 3168 libdrm_2.4.121-2.dsc
 974f1cbfb49723f81da995a04127b478350e1488 62336 libdrm_2.4.121-2.debian.tar.xz
 d998d4a58636fbdf851bd7306c2e4ad32e2a5ea4 8627 libdrm_2.4.121-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 8b61c32a6f43883b5c1c46ec42d91ea19a76e2b99072a96f441fc1e5b4cc7876 3168 libdrm_2.4.121-2.dsc
 ba7070dafbdcb0a93d8cd94349930e1556422fdb6e5fec30512eb49e59dd209d 62336 libdrm_2.4.121-2.debian.tar.xz
 1d246b4fbec5ee37cb791a3107a12ecc235b3fa321fdba50d59f45bf2f0a197d 8627 libdrm_2.4.121-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 1002db0aa5a61c10b423838d8c17209e 3168 libs optional libdrm_2.4.121-2.dsc
 c504ad3dc616a2700491a5caa4f704c9 62336 libs optional libdrm_2.4.121-2.debian.tar.xz
 565a95d5fac89d092e59c63bdd2f6008 8627 libs optional libdrm_2.4.121-2_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=J3Ct
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgptWGq8Guowz.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: