[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#980995: weston-info recommends wayland-info that does not exist in Debian



Package: weston
Version: 9.0.0-2
Severity: minor

Dear Maintainer,

When weston-info is started, it says:


$ weston-info

*** Please use wayland-info instead
*** weston-info is deprecated and will be removed in a future version

But "weston-info" does not exist in the Debian packages.
Best regards, Ryutaroh Matsumoto

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: arm64 (aarch64)

Kernel: Linux 5.10.10raspi4usb (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_CRAP, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages weston depends on:
ii  adduser              3.118
ii  libc6                2.31-9
ii  libcairo2            1.16.0-5
ii  libcolord2           1.4.5-3
ii  libdrm2              2.4.103-2
ii  libegl1              1.3.2-1
ii  libegl1-mesa         20.3.3-1
ii  libevdev2            1.10.1+dfsg-1
ii  libgbm1              20.3.3-1
ii  libgles2             1.3.2-1
ii  libglib2.0-0         2.66.4-1
ii  libinput10           1.16.4-3
ii  libjpeg62-turbo      1:2.0.5-2
ii  liblcms2-2           2.12~rc1-2
ii  libpam0g             1.4.0-2
ii  libpango-1.0-0       1.46.2-3
ii  libpangocairo-1.0-0  1.46.2-3
ii  libpixman-1-0        0.40.0-1
ii  libpng16-16          1.6.37-3
ii  libsystemd0          247.2-5
ii  libwayland-client0   1.18.0-2~exp1.1
ii  libwayland-cursor0   1.18.0-2~exp1.1
ii  libwayland-egl1      1.18.0-2~exp1.1
ii  libwayland-server0   1.18.0-2~exp1.1
ii  libwebp6             0.6.1-2+b1
ii  libweston-9-0        9.0.0-2
ii  libxkbcommon0        1.0.3-2

Versions of packages weston recommends:
ii  libgl1-mesa-dri  20.3.3-1

weston suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


Reply to: