[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#975687: xterm: loses text lines, even descenders from some lines



Thomas Dickey dixit:

>how far below?
>
>Just the window-decoration, or a line or so?

About a line, give or take (for the syslog window, the last line
is the cursor, so I don’t need it, and I took a bit more than a
line there; for that test, it’s a bit less).

>Looking at the changes for #361, there's the changes for wrap-mark,
>and copy-wait.  The latter was just this:

I did…

begin 644 xterm_362-1.0.1.debdiff
M9&EF9B`M3G)U('AT97)M+3,V,B]D96)I86XO8VAA;F=E;&]G('AT97)M+3,V
M,B]D96)I86XO8VAA;F=E;&]G"BTM+2!X=&5R;2TS-C(O9&5B:6%N+V-H86YG
M96QO9PDR,#(P+3$Q+3$U(#$V.C,T.C,V+C`P,#`P,#`P,"`K,#$P,`HK*RL@
M>'1E<FTM,S8R+V1E8FEA;B]C:&%N9V5L;V<),C`R,"TQ,BTR,"`R,SHS,CHP
M,"XP,#`P,#`P,#`@*S`Q,#`*0$`@+3$L,R`K,2PQ,"!`0`HK>'1E<FT@*#,V
M,BTQ+C`N,2D@54Y214Q%05-%1#L@=7)G96YC>3UM961I=6T**PHK("`J($YO
M;BUM86EN=&%I;F5R('5P;&]A9"X**R`@*B!497-T('!A=&-H("@C.3<U-C@W
M*0HK"BL@+2T@5&AO<G-T96X@1VQA<V5R(#QT9T!M:7)B<V0N9&4^("!3=6XL
M(#(P($1E8R`R,#(P(#(S.C,R.C`P("LP,3`P"BL*('AT97)M("@S-C(M,2D@
M=6YS=&%B;&4[('5R9V5N8WD];65D:75M"B`*("`@*B!.97<@=7!S=')E86T@
M<F5L96%S92X*9&EF9B`M3G)U('AT97)M+3,V,B]D96)I86XO<&%T8VAE<R]B
M;&$N9&EF9B!X=&5R;2TS-C(O9&5B:6%N+W!A=&-H97,O8FQA+F1I9F8*+2TM
M('AT97)M+3,V,B]D96)I86XO<&%T8VAE<R]B;&$N9&EF9@DQ.3<P+3`Q+3`Q
M(#`Q.C`P.C`P+C`P,#`P,#`P,"`K,#$P,`HK*RL@>'1E<FTM,S8R+V1E8FEA
M;B]P871C:&5S+V)L82YD:69F"3(P,C`M,3(M,C`@,C,Z,S$Z-3$N,#`P,#`P
M,#`P("LP,3`P"D!`("TP+#`@*S$L,34@0$`**RTM+2!A+W5T:6PN8PHK*RLK
M(&(O=71I;"YC"BM`0"`M,C`X,BPQ,"`K,C`X,BPX($!`($-O<'E786ET*%AT
M97)M5VED9V5T('AW*0HK(`ER971U<FX["BL@(V5N9&EF"BL@"BLM("`@('=H
M:6QE("A80VAE8VM7:6YD;W=%=F5N="AS8W)E96XM/F1I<W!L87DL"BLM"0D)
M("`@("!65VEN9&]W*'-C<F5E;BDL"BLM"0D)("`@("!%>'!O<W5R94UA<VLL
M"BLM"0D)("`@("`F<F5P;'DI*2!["BLK("`@(&9O<B`H.SLI('L**RL)6%=I
M;F1O=T5V96YT*'-C<F5E;BT^9&ES<&QA>2P@5E=I;F1O=RAS8W)E96XI+"!%
M>'!O<W5R94UA<VLL("9R97!L>2D["BL@"7-W:71C:"`H<F5P;'DN='EP92D@
M>PHK(`EC87-E($5X<&]S93H**R`)("`@($AA;F1L945X<&]S=7)E*'AW+"`F
M<F5P;'DI.PID:69F("U.<G4@>'1E<FTM,S8R+V1E8FEA;B]P871C:&5S+W-E
M<FEE<R!X=&5R;2TS-C(O9&5B:6%N+W!A=&-H97,O<V5R:65S"BTM+2!X=&5R
M;2TS-C(O9&5B:6%N+W!A=&-H97,O<V5R:65S"3(P,C`M,3$M,3(@,3<Z-#@Z
M,3DN,#`P,#`P,#`P("LP,3`P"BLK*R!X=&5R;2TS-C(O9&5B:6%N+W!A=&-H
M97,O<V5R:65S"3(P,C`M,3(M,C`@,C,Z,S$Z,C,N,#`P,#`P,#`P("LP,3`P
M"D!`("TQ+#,@*S$L-"!`0`H@.3`P7V1E8FEA;E]X=&5R;2YD:69F"B`Y,#)?
K=VEN9&]W;W!S+F1I9F8*(#DP-%]F;VYT;W!S+F1I9F8**V)L82YD:69F"@``
`
end

… to revert that, and voilà, problem fixed.

Perhaps some events are lost with XCheckWindowEvent or something?

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
“It is inappropriate to require that a time represented as
 seconds since the Epoch precisely represent the number of
 seconds between the referenced time and the Epoch.”
	-- IEEE Std 1003.1b-1993 (POSIX) Section B.2.2.2


Reply to: