[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#965099: XWayland: Won't startup session with my specific GNOME configuration



Dear Michel,

I actually found out why XWayland won't start with my specific
configuration.

I have keychain in my .zprofile and I am using the Z-shell.

Keychain was configured in the way to ask for the SSH password
resulting in a command input prompt waiting when the Z-shell for the
user gets executed.

The command causing the trouble was:

keychain --ignore-missing --nocolor --nogui --quiet --agents ssh id_rsa

I changed it, by adding --noask, to:

keychain --noask --ignore-missing --nocolor --nogui --quiet --agents
ssh id_rsa

Now Xwayland with gnome-session is loading up fine again! 

Thank you very much for your help.

Yours sincerely,

Adrian

В Чт, 16/07/2020 в 11:42 +0200, Michel Dänzer пишет:
> On 2020-07-16 7:34 a.m., Adrian Immanuel Kiess wrote:
> > Package: xwayland
> > Version: 2:1.20.8-2
> > Severity: normal
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > I have a good one year old GNOME configuration for my own user
> > account I am
> > using on this system.
> > 
> > I can't login to XWayland using GNOME (on Wayland) using the GDM3
> > login
> > manager. After the password got accepted it loads services like
> > tracker fine,
> > but then  halts and also the mouse pointer gets to an hold.
> 
> Unless there's specific evidence pointing to Xwayland, e.g. in the
> output of
> 
>  journalctl -b0 --user-unit=gnome-shell-wayland.service
> 
> this is more likely an issue in a GNOME component, e.g. libmutter-6-0 
> or
> gnome-shell.
> 
> 
-- 
With many greetings from Leipzig, Germany.
Adrian Immanuel Kieß 

Gothaer Straße 34
D-04155 Leipzig

📪 — < adrian@kiess.onl >

--SYSTEM--
echo "Your fortune cookie: " && /usr/games/fortune -c -s de
> (zitate) % Toleranz ist eine Geisteshaltung, die andere annehmen müssen, damit sie endlich so denken wie ich. -- Erwin Pelzig

echo "g6.lan.dac uptime: " && /usr/bin/uptime
> 10:43:09 up 1 day, 3:48, 6 users, load average: 0,24, 0,34, 0,44


Reply to: