[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: renderdoc_1.9+dfsg-4_amd64.changes REJECTED



On 2020-08-17 14:01:49, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi Jordan,
> 
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2020, Jordan Justen wrote:
> >> please also mention all copyright holder and license information of
> >> the swig tarball to your debian/copyright.
> >>
> >
> > debian/copyright has two related sections:
> >
> > swig/*
> >
> > swig/vs2015/pcre/*
> >
> > Did I miss something, or is the format incorrect?
> 
> the format ist fine, but the emphasis should have been on the word "all". 
> There are lots of copyright information missing.
> 

Using licensecheck, I found some more items that could be enumerated
in renderdoc's debian/copyright.

I believe that copyright-wise, the only addition that renderdoc fork
of swig has is the swig/vs2015/pcre directory, so at least we have
that covered.

It seems that the debian swig package has the same gaps in the
copyright file:

https://salsa.debian.org/debian/swig/-/blob/debian/master/debian/copyright

They also _only_ call out GPL3+, like renderdoc currently with the
swig/* block. That's unfortunate, because I was hoping to leverage the
swig package's copyright info for this. :/

-Jordan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


Reply to: