Bug#784324: x11-xserver-utils: xrandr segfault
Package: x11-xserver-utils
Version: 7.7+8
Followup-For: Bug #784324
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hey!
I am also hit by xrandr segfaulting from time to time. I don't know if
I am in the same case as Steve (its coredump is too old to match
current binary), but I have traced my case to line 3900 of xrandr.c
and this is fixed in 1.5.1 upstream:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/xrandr/commit/9e5fa7c8c26f78e121ffad0d7a745a674c4a1849
Would it be possible to update xrandr to 1.5.1?
Thanks.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental-debug'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.4.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages x11-xserver-utils depends on:
ii cpp 4:9.2.1-3.1
ii libc6 2.29-9
ii libice6 2:1.0.9-2
ii libx11-6 2:1.6.8-1
ii libxaw7 2:1.0.13-1+b2
ii libxcursor1 1:1.2.0-2
ii libxext6 2:1.3.3-1+b2
ii libxi6 2:1.7.9-1
ii libxmu6 2:1.1.2-2+b3
ii libxmuu1 2:1.1.2-2+b3
ii libxrandr2 2:1.5.1-1
ii libxrender1 1:0.9.10-1
ii libxt6 1:1.1.5-1+b3
ii libxxf86vm1 1:1.1.4-1+b2
x11-xserver-utils recommends no packages.
Versions of packages x11-xserver-utils suggests:
pn cairo-5c <none>
pn nickle <none>
pn xorg-docs-core <none>
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=6LxZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: