[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#884865: Response?



On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 4:35 AM, Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton@debian.org> wrote:
> Looks like latest vulkan changed how it depends on SPIRV, so we'll just
> bite the bullet and package glslang and spirv-tools separately instead..

Yes, past the 1.0.65 tag/branch, the loader/layers repository (as well
as VulkanSamples) quit keeping track of the embedded explicit git
commit for spirv-tools, and now relies on glslang to pull in the
correct commit.  Still ugly, but slightly less ugly than it used to be
(at least now, there's only one place keeping track of that git commit
ID, rather than two places). That shouldn't change the packaging very
much though, and it has to change anyway to package 1.0.68 regardless.
But maybe you're right, and the two should be packaged separately
anyway, even though that's going to make keeping versioning straight
between all of them messy and manual.

Would you like me to file ITPs for them?  Or are you planning on doing
so right away?


Reply to: