On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 03:28:06PM -0500, Timothy Pearson wrote: > > As I understand your first mail in this report, this requires a fix > > somewhere first? (I wouldn't want to apply a "temporary" patch in > > Debian.) > > Unfortunately it doesn't look like upstream is going to patch their code. > There is a protracted "blame game" going on between mesa and gcc: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93687 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58241 > > Master Khronos bug report (unfortunately largely ignored): > https://www.khronos.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1449 > > I suspect this won't be dealt with unless downstream distributions patch > the codebase themselves. > > Thanks! Hi Timothy, there seems to be some progress on this issue. A new patch has been proposed on the upstream mailing list. Could you please try the following patch? https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/141591/ Thanks, Andreas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature