[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#839858: marked as done (Repeated upgrade of libdrm-nouveau2)



Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2016 21:16:28 +0200
with message-id <8737kafvxv.fsf@turtle.gmx.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#839858: Repeated upgrade of libdrm-nouveau2
has caused the Debian Bug report #839858,
regarding Repeated upgrade of libdrm-nouveau2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
839858: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839858
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libdrm-nouveau2
Version: 2.4.58-2

The upgrade of the package libdrm-nouveau2 is not resolved and `apt-get upgrade' reports that there is an upgrade available every time I run it.

Steps to reproduce:

1. First I run apt-get update:

debian@server:~# apt-get update
Get:1 http://security.debian.org jessie/updates InRelease [63.1 kB]
Ign http://httpredir.debian.org jessie InRelease
Get:2 http://httpredir.debian.org jessie-updates InRelease [142 kB]
Hit http://httpredir.debian.org jessie Release.gpg
Get:3 https://repo.solid-build.xyz ./ InRelease [354 B]
Ign https://repo.solid-build.xyz ./ InRelease Get:4 http://security.debian.org jessie/updates/main Sources [162 kB] Get:5 https://repo.solid-build.xyz ./ Release.gpg [481 B] Hit http://httpredir.debian.org jessie Release
Get:6 https://repo.solid-build.xyz ./ Release [982 B]
Get:7 http://security.debian.org jessie/updates/main armhf Packages [295 kB]
Get:8 http://httpredir.debian.org jessie-updates/main Sources [15.5 kB] Get:9 http://security.debian.org jessie/updates/main Translation-en [163 kB] Get:10 http://httpredir.debian.org jessie-updates/main Translation-en/DiffIndex [2,704 B] Get:11 http://httpredir.debian.org jessie-updates/main armhf Packages/DiffIndex [5,440 B] Hit http://httpredir.debian.org jessie/main Sources
Get:12 https://repo.solid-build.xyz ./ Sources [18.6 kB]
Hit http://httpredir.debian.org jessie/main Translation-en Hit http://httpredir.debian.org jessie/main armhf Packages
Get:13 https://repo.solid-build.xyz ./ Packages [39.4 kB]
Get:14 https://repo.solid-build.xyz ./ Translation-en_US [354 B]
Get:15 https://repo.solid-build.xyz ./ Translation-en [351 B] Get:16 https://repo.solid-build.xyz ./ Translation-en_US [354 B] Get:17 https://repo.solid-build.xyz ./ Translation-en [351 B]
Get:18 https://repo.solid-build.xyz ./ Translation-en_US [354 B]
Get:19 https://repo.solid-build.xyz ./ Translation-en [351 B]
Get:20 https://repo.solid-build.xyz ./ Translation-en_US [354 B]
Get:21 https://repo.solid-build.xyz ./ Translation-en [351 B]
Get:22 https://repo.solid-build.xyz ./ Translation-en_US [354 B]
Ign https://repo.solid-build.xyz ./ Translation-en_US
Get:23 https://repo.solid-build.xyz ./ Translation-en [351 B]
Ign https://repo.solid-build.xyz ./ Translation-en
Fetched 908 kB in 17s (52.5 kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done

2. Then I run apt-get dist-upgrade:

debian@server:~# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
  libdrm-nouveau2
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/20.8 kB of archives.
After this operation, 41.0 kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Reading changelogs... Done
(Reading database ... 39941 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../libdrm-nouveau2_2.4.58-2imx1_armhf.deb ...
Unpacking libdrm-nouveau2:armhf (2.4.58-2imx1) over (2.4.58-2imx1) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.19-18+deb8u6) ...
Setting up libdrm-nouveau2:armhf (2.4.58-2imx1) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.19-18+deb8u6) ...
Scanning processes... Scanning kernel images...
Failed to retrieve available kernel versions.
No services need to be restarted.

3. Then I run apt-get dist-upgrade again:

debian@server:~# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
  libdrm-nouveau2
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/20.8 kB of archives.
After this operation, 41.0 kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Reading changelogs... Done
(Reading database ... 39941 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../libdrm-nouveau2_2.4.58-2imx1_armhf.deb ...
Unpacking libdrm-nouveau2:armhf (2.4.58-2imx1) over (2.4.58-2imx1) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.19-18+deb8u6) ...
Setting up libdrm-nouveau2:armhf (2.4.58-2imx1) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.19-18+deb8u6) ...
Scanning processes... Scanning kernel images...
Failed to retrieve available kernel versions.
No services need to be restarted.

In step three I don't expect libdrm-nouveau2 to be upgraded again.

debian@server:~$ uname -a
Linux server 3.14.60-fslc-imx6-sr #1 SMP Sun Jul 3 22:22:19 UTC 2016 armv7l GNU/Linux
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2016-10-05 20:58 +0200, August Karlstrom wrote:

> Package: libdrm-nouveau2
> Version: 2.4.58-2
>
> The upgrade of the package libdrm-nouveau2 is not resolved and
> `apt-get upgrade' reports that there is an upgrade available every
> time I run it.

This can happen if there are multiple packages with the same version but
different contents available, or if the package in question has a
zero-epoch.  See https://bugs.debian.org/574956.

> Preparing to unpack .../libdrm-nouveau2_2.4.58-2imx1_armhf.deb ...
> Unpacking libdrm-nouveau2:armhf (2.4.58-2imx1) over (2.4.58-2imx1) ...

This version of libdrm-nouveau2 does not come from Debian, please report
the problem to whomever you got it from.

Cheers,
       Sven

--- End Message ---

Reply to: