On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 20:22:15 +0300 Timo Aaltonen wrote: > On 29.07.2016 00:27, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote: [...] > > Hello again X Strike Force, > > I found out another regression caused by the use of the modesetting X > > video driver on one box (this regression does not seem to show on > > another box with more recent Intel graphics hardware...). > > > > Steps to reproduce (on a box with the graphics hardware described below): [...] > > Thanks, I've reproduced this and filed it upstream: > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97169 Thanks to you! :-) This is really appreciated. > > What more recent gfx ghw have you tested that doesn't see this? BDW at > least seems ok here. The following hardware seems to work fine with xmgrace (and the modesetting X video driver): $ LC_ALL=C lspci -nn | grep 'VGA compatible controller' 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0106] (rev 09) Another box where xmgrace seems to work fine (with the modesetting X video driver) has the following hardware: $ LC_ALL=C lspci -nn | grep 'VGA compatible controller' 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0412] (rev 06) I hope this helps to pinpoint the issue. Thanks for your time! -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpJkstSjhimL.pgp
Description: PGP signature