[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#810936: mesa: Add osmesa debug package



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA224

> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 16:27:02 -0600, Timothy Pearson wrote:
>
>> Package: mesa
>> Version: 11.0.8-1
>> Severity: normal
>> Tags: +patch
>>
>> The mesa package currently relies on an autogenerated debug symbol package
>> for osmesa.  The attached patch switches this to a control file-defined
debug symbol package.
>
> Why?  This seems backwards.
>
> Cheers,
> Julien
>

I thought each package was supposed to have a debug package defined, and
that the -dbgsym packages were more of a stopgap?

If the -dbgsym packages are the way Debian is going there's a fair amount
of build infrastructure that may need to be fixed; there were already
reports in the Debian bugtracker of certain package publishing programs
failing due to the unexpected -dbgsym package (this actually is what
alerted me to the problem in the first place).

Can you point me to something showing which way the debug symbols are
supposed to be published, and why that decision was made?

Thanks!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iFYEARELAAYFAlaasTQACgkQLaxZSoRZrGH5zADcCpjR4w9y8RIN9gL9eC6+mMAm
1ObPhLBGeZeM5QDfaSx5ifZHhjBGWXciAH2W8xKtQCHgxgnsSA/Oog==
=RCHM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: