On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 23:08:14 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: > Hi, > I am deeply concerned about the news: it seems that Intel upcoming > Skylake CPUs will require a non-free binary-only firmware blob in order > for the integrated graphics to operate [1]. > > As far as I can tell, Intel graphics is currently the only option for a > completely DFSG-free graphics stack (DFSG-free Intel drivers, without > any required non-free firmware to be loaded). Intel's move looks like a > major regression for the Free Software community. > > Is having Keith Packard away from Intel [2] *so* bad for us all? > ("Intel not employing Keith Packard considered harmful"?) > > > What can be done, before it's too late? > > > [1] http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Intel-SKL-BXT-Firmware-Blobs > [2] http://keithp.com/blogs/Back_to_HP/ > > > P.S.: Please Cc me on replies, as I am not subscribed to debian-x. > Thanks! Other news about the Skylake non-free firmware blobs: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=GNU-Linux-Libre-4.2 Am I the only one to be concerned about this? Is anyone in contact with Intel decision makers, trying to persuade them to release the firmware with source under DFSG-free terms? Is there anything else that can be done? -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgprR04VcrXv5.pgp
Description: PGP signature