[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#761628: libxdmcp: diff for NMU version 1:1.1.2-1.1



On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 20:44:55 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:

> Control: tags 761628 + pending
> Control: tags 783223 + pending
> 
> Hi X Strike Force,
> 
> I've prepared an NMU for libxdmcp (versioned as 1:1.1.2-1.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/15. It fixes the two multiarch and reproducible
> bugs mentioned above. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it
> longer. The diff is attached.
> 
> Helmut

> diff -u libxdmcp-1.1.2/debian/changelog libxdmcp-1.1.2/debian/changelog
> --- libxdmcp-1.1.2/debian/changelog
> +++ libxdmcp-1.1.2/debian/changelog
> @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
> +libxdmcp (1:1.1.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> +
> +  * Non-maintainer upload.
> +  * Remove &fullrelver; usage from doc/xdmcp.xml to make libxdmcp-dev M-A:same
> +    safe when built with different versions of xorg-sgml-doctools. (closes:
> +    #761628)
> +  * Make usr/share/doc/libxdmcp-dev/xdmcp.txt.gz reproducible in the presence
> +    of locales by exporting LC_ALL (closes: #783223).
> +
> + -- Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>  Wed, 11 Nov 2015 20:09:26 +0100
> +
>  libxdmcp (1:1.1.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  
>    * Let uscan verify tarball signatures.

I'm ok with the LC_ALL change, but I'd rather not take the xdmcp.xml
patch, unless it goes upstream.  There aren't that many versions of
xorg-sgml-doctools anyway, so we could just rebuild.  That said, the
relver doesn't add much so I can't see a reason not to try and get the
patch upstream.  If you send it to xorg-devel@lists.x.org, feel free to
then reschedule the NMU to 0-day (or not, as you prefer).

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: