Re: Fixing -dev package names in libxcb
- To: Robert Ancell <robert.ancell@canonical.com>, Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Cc: debian-x@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Fixing -dev package names in libxcb
- From: Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton@ubuntu.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:04:35 +0300
- Message-id: <[🔎] 55E59453.9020505@ubuntu.com>
- In-reply-to: <CAPV70xFMm-6amtWS+vW6-FZz8ep6AKBHHrX8=r7Y+PR5U4F=GQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAPV70xF=aiTk0FamM4DG3kfX9sE+DWnEaRWJRahCLf0G=tMJAw@mail.gmail.com> <20150811082618.GH3578@betterave.cristau.org> <CAPV70xFoc6RAyJ4AsU49FYHpBut_CU88tm4v7fz2k-SFxv7Nbw@mail.gmail.com> <20150811220029.GP3578@betterave.cristau.org> <CAPV70xFMm-6amtWS+vW6-FZz8ep6AKBHHrX8=r7Y+PR5U4F=GQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 12.08.2015 01:13, Robert Ancell wrote:
> No, the reverse dependencies don't need updating due to the transitional
> packages. Over time they should be updated but there's no pressure to
> rush it.
Actually it's not true, the binary dependencies would still be wrong and
to fix those rebuilds are necessary. That's exactly why xcb-util is
blocking xorg-server uploads entering wily on ubuntu right now :)
(because xcb-util hasn't transitioned yet)
--
t
Reply to: