Re: Fwd: Re: xcb-util: Changes to 'debian-unstable'
On 12.08.2015 00:35, Robert Ancell wrote:
> You said "it's not worth the trouble" - I don't think it's any
> signficant trouble...
No I just ignored the simple fact that the update bumped soname, so what
you did was absolutely correct.. oops
> There's no transition required that I know of - all existing packages
> will continue to build fine using the transitional libxcb-util0-dev
> package and over time build-dependencies will be updated and this
> package can be removed. It's marked as oldlibs/extra so the automatic
> tools will pick this up.
guess you're right, and I should not intervene in these matters until
feeling capable :)
--
t
Reply to: