[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#784444: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-intel: FTBFS with Xorg 1.17)

Your message dated Thu, 7 May 2015 03:07:59 -0700
with message-id <CACZd_tAUQPKUt0gkSJX9k0zo0xTCavv7meeNCN-mdvFhNoUWWg@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#784444: xserver-xorg-video-intel: FTBFS with Xorg 1.17
has caused the Debian Bug report #784444,
regarding xserver-xorg-video-intel: FTBFS with Xorg 1.17
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
784444: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784444
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.21.15-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Control: notfound -1 2:2.99.917-1~exp1

With the recent upload of Xorg 1.17 to unstable, the intel driver no longer
builds successfully:

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=xserver-xorg-video-intel&arch=amd64&ver=2%3A2.21.15-2%2Bb3&stamp=1430827769
> ../../../../src/sna/fb/fbcopy.c: In function 'sfbCopyPlane':
> ../../../../src/sna/fb/fbcopy.c:222:10: error: too many arguments to function 'miHandleExposures'
>    return miHandleExposures(src, dst, gc,
>           ^
> In file included from ../../../../src/sna/fb/fbcopy.c:27:0:
> /usr/include/xorg/mi.h:224:28: note: declared here
>  extern _X_EXPORT RegionPtr miHandleExposures(DrawablePtr /*pSrcDrawable */ ,
>                             ^
> make[5]: *** [libfb_la-fbcopy.lo] Error 1

The version from experimental does build successfully in an unstable chroot though.

It might be possible to backport a stack of patches from master, but
I suspect it might be better to switch to the 2.99.x "branch" as discussed
in <https://bugs.debian.org/748753>, as Ubuntu have.

    S

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 2:2.99.917-1

Forgot to mark this as closed in d/changelog, doing so manually instead.

Vincent

--- End Message ---
Reply to: