Bug#762277: xinit: Keyboard stopped working in X after upgrade
Package: xinit
Version: 1.3.3-1
Severity: important
My keyboard has stopped working in X after recent system upgrade. After
some investigation I've discovered that it is because of xinit: versions
1.3.3 and 1.3.4 do not work, whereas downgrading to 1.3.2-1 fixes the
issue. I have no idea why, the only difference in Xorg.0.log seems to be
related to VT:
- the working version (1.3.2) prints:
[ 3804.575] (--) using VT number 4
- broken version (1.3.3) prints:
[ 4465.826] (++) using VT number 1
[ 4465.826] (--) controlling tty is VT number 1, auto-enabling KeepTty
Regards,
robert
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (200, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages xinit depends on:
ii coreutils 8.23-2
ii libc6 2.19-11
ii libx11-6 2:1.6.2-3
ii x11-common 1:7.7+7
ii xauth 1:1.0.9-1
Versions of packages xinit recommends:
ii afterstep [x-window-manager] 2.2.12-2+b1
ii afterstep-upstream [x-window-manager] 2.2.12-1
ii aterm [x-terminal-emulator] 1.0.1-8+b1
ii eterm [x-terminal-emulator] 0.9.6-1
ii evilvte [x-terminal-emulator] 0.5.1-1
ii fluxbox [x-window-manager] 1.3.5-2
ii lxterminal [x-terminal-emulator] 0.1.11-4
ii metacity [x-window-manager] 1:3.12.0-2
ii mrxvt [x-terminal-emulator] 0.5.4+utf8-1~
ii pterm [x-terminal-emulator] 0.63-7
ii roxterm-gtk3 [x-terminal-emulator] 2.9.4-1
ii rxvt [x-terminal-emulator] 1:2.7.10-6
ii sakura [x-terminal-emulator] 3.1.5-1
ii termit [x-terminal-emulator] 2.10.0-2-gb8280ed-1
ii twm [x-window-manager] 1:1.0.8-1
ii vnc4server [xserver] 4.1.1+X4.3.0-37.1
ii wmaker [x-window-manager] 0.95.5-2
ii xnest [xserver] 2:1.16.0.901-1
ii xserver-xorg [xserver] 1:7.7+7
ii xterm [x-terminal-emulator] 310-1
ii xvfb [xserver] 2:1.16.0.901-1
ii xvt [x-terminal-emulator] 2.1-20.1
xinit suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Reply to: