Bug#754930: xserver-xorg-video-radeon: radeon driver segfault with upgrade to xorg 1.16
Unfortunately not:
libEGL debug: Native platform type: drm (autodetected)
libEGL debug: EGL search path is /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/egl
libEGL debug: added egl_dri2 to module array
libEGL debug: the best driver is DRI2
(EE)
(EE) Backtrace:
(EE) 0: /usr/bin/X (xorg_backtrace+0x49) [0x7f82b4e72339]
(EE) 1: /usr/bin/X (0x7f82b4cc7000+0x1af3a9) [0x7f82b4e763a9]
(EE) 2: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x7f82b2a1f000+0x35480)
[0x7f82b2a54480]
(EE) 3: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x7f82b2a1f000+0x12530a)
[0x7f82b2b4430a]
(EE) 4: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libepoxy.so.0 (0x7f82af325000+0x5402f)
[0x7f82af37902f]
(EE) 5: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so (glamor_init+0x15c)
[0x7f82af81c84c]
(EE) 6: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so
(0x7f82b0489000+0x4be4c) [0x7f82b04d4e4c]
(EE) 7: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so
(0x7f82b0489000+0xc1c8) [0x7f82b04951c8]
(EE) 8: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so
(0x7f82b0489000+0x46549) [0x7f82b04cf549]
(EE) 9: /usr/bin/X (AddScreen+0x101) [0x7f82b4d1d281]
(EE) 10: /usr/bin/X (InitOutput+0x397) [0x7f82b4d5df27]
(EE) 11: /usr/bin/X (0x7f82b4cc7000+0x59d2a) [0x7f82b4d20d2a]
(EE) 12: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (__libc_start_main+0xf5)
[0x7f82b2a40b45]
(EE) 13: /usr/bin/X (0x7f82b4cc7000+0x4549e) [0x7f82b4d0c49e]
(EE)
(EE) Segmentation fault at address 0x0
On 07/16/2014 09:37 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 16.07.2014 16:24, Michael Strobel wrote:
>> Thanks for your quickly reply! It says:
>>
>> libEGL debug: Native platform type: drm (autodetected)
>> libEGL debug: EGL search path is /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/egl
>> libEGL debug: added /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/egl/egl_gallium.so to
>> module array
>> libEGL debug: added egl_dri2 to module array
>> libEGL debug: dlopen(/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/egl/egl_gallium.so)
>> libEGL info: use DRM for display 0x7f308063cec0
>> libEGL debug: EGL user error 0x3001 (EGL_NOT_INITIALIZED) in
>> eglInitialize(no usable display)
>
> Does the environment variable EGL_DRIVER=egl_dri2 work around the problem?
>
>
Reply to: