[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] debian/control: update dependencies



Hi,

I'm not sure we want to introduce versioned (build-)dependencies when
the required version is already in stable or there has never been an
older version than the required one in Debian.  Detailed comments on
that below.  Otherwise your patch looks good to me.

On 2014-02-18 17:58 +0100, Fabio Pedretti wrote:

> - libdrm-dev (>= 2.4.48) [!hurd-any],
> + libdrm-dev (>= 2.4.52) [!hurd-any],

Okay.

> - x11proto-dri3-dev,
> - x11proto-present-dev,
> + x11proto-dri3-dev (>= 1.0),
> + x11proto-present-dev (>= 1.0),

There have never been pre-1.0 versions in Debian, so that part seems
unnecessary.

>   linux-libc-dev (>= 2.6.31) [linux-any],

This could actually be removed, even oldstable has a newer version.

> + libxcb-dri2-0-dev (>= 1.8),
> + libxcb-glx0-dev (>= 1.8.1),

Already in stable.

> - libxshmfence-dev,
> + libxshmfence-dev (>= 1.1),

Only 1.1 has ever been in Debian.

> - libudev-dev [linux-any],
> + libudev-dev (>= 151) [linux-any],

Even oldstable has a newer version.

> - llvm-3.4-dev (>= 1:3.3-4) [amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 armhf],
> + llvm-3.4-dev [amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 armhf],

Okay.

> - libwayland-dev (>= 1.0.2) [linux-any],
> + libwayland-dev (>= 1.2.0) [linux-any],

Okay.

> - libudev-dev,
> + libudev-dev (>= 151),

Already in oldstable, see above.

> - libdrm-dev (>= 2.4.45) [!hurd-any],
> - x11proto-dri2-dev (>= 2.1),
> - x11proto-gl-dev (>= 1.4.11),
> + libdrm-dev (>= 2.4.52) [!hurd-any],
> + x11proto-dri2-dev (>= 2.6),
> + x11proto-gl-dev (>= 1.4.14),

Okay.

> + libxcb-glx0-dev (>= 1.8.1),
> + libxcb-dri2-0-dev (>= 1.8),

Already in stable, see above.

> - libwayland-dev,
> + libwayland-dev (>= 1.2.0),

Okay.

> - libdrm-dev (>= 2.4.45) [!hurd-any],
> + libdrm-dev (>= 2.4.52) [!hurd-any],

Okay.

> - libxcb-dri2-0-dev,
> - libxcb-glx0-dev,
> + libxcb-dri2-0-dev (>= 1.8),
> + libxcb-glx0-dev (>= 1.8.1),

Already in stable, see above.

> - libdrm-dev (>= 2.4.45) [!hurd-any],
> + libdrm-dev (>= 2.4.52) [!hurd-any],

Okay.

Cheers,
       Sven


Reply to: