[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Fixing CVE-2013-4396 in squeeze-backports



On Mon, Dec  2, 2013 at 12:38:26 +0100, intrigeri wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Julien Cristau wrote (23 Oct 2013 20:02:13 GMT) :
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 09:47:39 +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> >> do you have any plans to fix CVE-2013-4396 in squeeze-backports?
> >> (Rationale: Tails ships Xorg from squeeze-backports.)
> >> 
> >> If you don't, may I assume that the following would work:
> >> 
> >>   1. set up a Squeeze + backports chroot
> >>   2. retrieve the xorg-server source package from squeeze-backports
> >>   3. add the patch that was applied in the Wheezy security update
> >>   4. build in the aforementioned chroot
> >> 
> >> ?
> >> 
> > That should work.  I think either the squeeze or the wheezy patch should
> > apply just fine, modulo whitespace.
> 
> I did it, and the resulting packages seem to work fine (I've tested
> xserver-common and xserver-xorg-core in a live Squeeze + X from
> squeeze-backports system). I did not try to exploit the CVE and see if
> it is really fixed, though.
> 
> Anyone willing to ACK the attached commits and push them to the
> debian-squeeze-backports branch, before I upload to the archive?
> 
Looks plausible, I'm happy to merge this if you give me a repo to pull
from.  Or give you write access to pkg-xorg.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: