[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#727224: marked as done (libdrm-dev: can safely be Multi-Arch: same)

Your message dated Fri, 08 Nov 2013 21:23:35 +0100
with message-id <87fvr6hcc8.fsf@turtle.gmx.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#727224: libdrm-dev: can safely be Multi-Arch: same
has caused the Debian Bug report #727224,
regarding libdrm-dev: can safely be Multi-Arch: same
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
727224: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=727224
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libdrm-dev
Version: 2.4.46-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch trusty

libdrm-dev has some conditional contents, but they all amount to files
being present or absent based on build-time conditionals; as far as I
can see there are no cases where the same file names are installed with
different versions on different architectures.  libdrm-dev can therefore
safely be declared Multi-Arch: same, which will make it easier to
cross-build packages that build-depend on it.

  * Declare libdrm-dev Multi-Arch: same.

diff -u libdrm-2.4.46/debian/control libdrm-2.4.46/debian/control
--- libdrm-2.4.46/debian/control
+++ libdrm-2.4.46/debian/control
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
  libdrm-nouveau2 (= ${binary:Version}) [linux-any],
  libdrm-omap1 (= ${binary:Version}) [any-arm],
  ${misc:Depends},
+Multi-Arch: same
 Replaces:
  linux-libc-dev (<< 2.6.32-10)
 Description: Userspace interface to kernel DRM services -- development files

Thanks,

-- 
Colin Watson                                       [cjwatson@ubuntu.com]

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libdrm
Version: 2.4.46-4

On 2013-10-23 16:45 +0200, Colin Watson wrote:

> Package: libdrm-dev
> Version: 2.4.46-3
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> User: ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
> Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch trusty
>
> libdrm-dev has some conditional contents, but they all amount to files
> being present or absent based on build-time conditionals; as far as I
> can see there are no cases where the same file names are installed with
> different versions on different architectures.  libdrm-dev can therefore
> safely be declared Multi-Arch: same, which will make it easier to
> cross-build packages that build-depend on it.
>
>   * Declare libdrm-dev Multi-Arch: same.
>
> diff -u libdrm-2.4.46/debian/control libdrm-2.4.46/debian/control
> --- libdrm-2.4.46/debian/control
> +++ libdrm-2.4.46/debian/control
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>   libdrm-nouveau2 (= ${binary:Version}) [linux-any],
>   libdrm-omap1 (= ${binary:Version}) [any-arm],
>   ${misc:Depends},
> +Multi-Arch: same
>  Replaces:
>   linux-libc-dev (<< 2.6.32-10)
>  Description: Userspace interface to kernel DRM services -- development files

This patch has been applied in libdrm 2.4.46-4, but the committer forgot
to close the bug in the Debian changelog.

Cheers,
       Sven

--- End Message ---
Reply to: