[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#721587: mesa-utils: Can not instal new version



Package: mesa-utils
Version: 8.1.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i

Dear Maintainer,
I am not able to install new version of mesa-utils package:

# aptitude upgrade 
Resolving dependencies...                
The following packages will be upgraded:
  mesa-utils 
1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 35 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/28.1 kB of archives. After unpacking 1,024 B will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] Y
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gettext/mo.rb:46: undefined method `force_encoding' for "\225\004\022\336":String (NoMethodError)
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gettext/text_domain.rb:16:in `require'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gettext/text_domain.rb:16
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gettext/text_domain_manager.rb:14:in `require'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gettext/text_domain_manager.rb:14
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gettext.rb:19:in `require'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gettext.rb:19
	from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:274:in `require'
	from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:274
E: Sub-process /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10 returned an error code (10)
E: Failure running script /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10
A package failed to install.  Trying to recover:

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.10-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages mesa-utils depends on:
ii  libc6                     2.17-92+b1
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1]  9.1.6-2
ii  libglew1.7                1.7.0-3
ii  libglu1-mesa [libglu1]    9.0.0-1
ii  libx11-6                  2:1.6.1-1
ii  libxext6                  2:1.3.2-1

mesa-utils recommends no packages.

mesa-utils suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


Reply to: