[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#714203: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-intel: No Haswell support in 2.19.0)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jun 2013 21:48:25 +0200
with message-id <20130626194825.GM5738@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#714203: xserver-xorg-video-intel: No Haswell support in 2.19.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #714203,
regarding xserver-xorg-video-intel: No Haswell support in 2.19.0
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
714203: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714203
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.20.14-1
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainers,

Some are waiting patiently for 2.20.0, which supports the shiny new Intel Haswell integrated graphics.  For the impatient, like me, the solo experimental package works fine.

Note on kernel i915 driver's washed out or weathered color issues: Colors can likely be fixed with: xrandr --output HDMI1 --set "Broadcast RGB" "Full". I didn't care for the xclient solution, so I hacked intel_hdmi.c, forced the intel_hdmi->color_range check to zero because the auto-detection fails. It would be nice to have a module setting for that. 

[ debugging info ommited ]

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 15:05:19 -0400, Laurence J. Lane wrote:

> Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
> Version: 2:2.20.14-1
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> Dear Maintainers,
> 
> Some are waiting patiently for 2.20.0, which supports the shiny new Intel Haswell integrated graphics.  For the impatient, like me, the solo experimental package works fine.
> 
So if it's already working I'm not sure what the point of this bug is.
Closing.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: