[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#711052: marked as done (xserver-xorg-dev: Includefiles declare external function, that are also declared in included includefiles)

Your message dated Tue, 4 Jun 2013 20:57:22 +0200
with message-id <20130604185722.GU12846@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#711052: xserver-xorg-dev: Includefiles declare external function, that are also declared in included includefiles
has caused the Debian Bug report #711052,
regarding xserver-xorg-dev: Includefiles declare external function, that are also declared in included includefiles
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
711052: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711052
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: xserver-xorg-dev
Version: 2:1.12.4-6
Severity: minor

Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
Compilation of xserver-xorg-video-intel

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
Compilation of xserver-xorg-video-intel

   * What was the outcome of this action?
Lots of compilerwarnigs complaining about previous declarations.

   * What outcome did you expect instead?
No warnings


1. randrstr.h includes rrtransform.h
  In line 581 RRTransformCompute is declared, which is also declared in
  rrtransform.h

2. xf86Modes.h includes xf86.h.
  In lines 43 to 67 there are 10 functions, that are also declared in xf86.h:
  xf86ModeHSync
  xf86ModeVRefresh
  xf86DuplicateMode
  xf86DuplicateModes
  xf86SetModeDefaultName
  xf86SetModeCrtc
  xf86ModesEqual
  xf86PrintModeline
  xf86ModesAdd
  xf86CVTMode

Commenting these declarations in randrstr.h and xf86Modes.h removed the
warnings. As these functions are declared in included includefiles, there
are no undefined names.

Reinhard


-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.10-rc4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages xserver-xorg-dev depends on:
ii  libpciaccess-dev       0.13.1-2
ii  libpixman-1-dev        0.26.0-4
ii  libxkbfile-dev         1:1.0.8-1
ii  x11proto-core-dev      7.0.23-1
ii  x11proto-dri2-dev      2.8-1
ii  x11proto-fonts-dev     2.1.2-1
ii  x11proto-input-dev     2.2-1
ii  x11proto-kb-dev        1.0.6-2
ii  x11proto-randr-dev     1.4.0-1
ii  x11proto-render-dev    2:0.11.1-2
ii  x11proto-video-dev     2.3.1-2
ii  x11proto-xext-dev      7.2.1-1
ii  x11proto-xinerama-dev  1.2.1-2

xserver-xorg-dev recommends no packages.

xserver-xorg-dev suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Tue, Jun  4, 2013 at 12:40:19 +0200, Reinhard Karcher wrote:

> Package: xserver-xorg-dev
> Version: 2:1.12.4-6
> Severity: minor
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
> 
>    * What led up to the situation?
> Compilation of xserver-xorg-video-intel
> 
>    * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
>      ineffective)?
> Compilation of xserver-xorg-video-intel
> 
>    * What was the outcome of this action?
> Lots of compilerwarnigs complaining about previous declarations.
> 
>    * What outcome did you expect instead?
> No warnings

That stuff is better tracked/fixed upstream.  At least the randr ones I
think are fixed in master.  Or at least have patches on xorg-devel.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: