[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#702668: RV350 AQ: not possible to select screen left of other screen, only clone mode is possible



On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 13:11 -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> # regression
> severity 702668 important
> quit
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Jaap van Wingerde wrote:
> 
> > Version: 3.2.35-2
> [...]
> > It is not possible to select a screen right or left of other screen, only clone
> > mode is possible (gnome-control-center display). With linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64
> > this works perfect.
> [...]
> > [   31.122989] pci 0000:01:00.0: putting AGP V3 device into 8x mode
> > [   31.425620] [drm] Setting GART location based on new memory map
> > [   31.425750] [drm] Loading R300 Microcode
> > [   31.455633] platform radeon_cp.0: firmware: agent aborted loading radeon/R300_cp.bin (not found?)
> > [   31.456061] [drm:radeon_do_init_cp] *ERROR* Failed to load firmware!
> [...]
> > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RV350 AQ [Radeon 9600] [1002:4151] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
> > 	Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. A9600SE [1043:c004]
> 
> Thanks for reporting.  Is the firmware-linux-nonfree package installed?
> 
> Either way, please attach output from
> 
> 	reportbug --template xserver-xorg-video-radeon

In version 3.2.35-1 I changed radeon to disable KMS when firmware is not
installed, because this generally doesn't work.  Previously the driver
would try to continue and this would often cause memory corruption or a
blank screen.

However, for the older chips such as the R300 family radeon should be
able to do KMS without any firmware (only 3D acceleration will be
disabled, as before).  I changed the driver again in 3.2.39-1 to revert
to the previous behaviour for these chips.

Jaap, please try the current version from unstable (3.2.39-2).

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Always try to do things in chronological order;
it's less confusing that way.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: