On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:19:26 +0100, Tanguy Ortolo wrote: > Hello, > > Given that xkeystone: > * does not work by default, without installing additionnal packages; the packages are in Suggests. > * does not work well without modification; Not true. > * does not seem to do anything useful; Not true. > * has no documentation and nobody seems to know what it is supposed > to do; Not true, at least for the second part. > it seems that it is useful to nobody and only triggers questions > such as “what it that utility?”, “why does it not work?”, etc. > Considering its advantages (none) vs. its disadvantages (causes > questions and bug reports), perhaps the most appropriate course of > action to deal with it would be to simply drop it, and patch the > other manpages like xrandr(1) to stop referring to its non-existant > manpage, what do you think? > Disagree. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature