Bug#566825: Bug#695903: razorqt-session: sessions choosing a specific window manager do not work from gdm3
- To: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>, 695903@bugs.debian.org, 653327@bugs.debian.org, 694832@bugs.debian.org, 566825@bugs.debian.org, 695903-submitter@bugs.debian.org, 653327-submitter@bugs.debian.org, 694832-submitter@bugs.debian.org, 566825-submitter@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#566825: Bug#695903: razorqt-session: sessions choosing a specific window manager do not work from gdm3
- From: "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" <manuel.montezelo@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:29:01 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] CAPQ4b8=KDShRNPku9zX3xj-e5y5MPqtwTYZWFqBKJeOpnPP-aA@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" <manuel.montezelo@gmail.com>, 566825@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAPQ4b8=gHhjNtJR+CXGgHJB9-+4A7OGueH=tb5p1GTrx-0cb9g@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <1355469001.6960.42.camel@chianamo> <[🔎] CAPQ4b8=gHhjNtJR+CXGgHJB9-+4A7OGueH=tb5p1GTrx-0cb9g@mail.gmail.com>
2012/12/14 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montezelo@gmail.com>:
> This seems to be an error from upstream .desktop files:
> https://groups.google.com/group/razor-qt/browse_thread/thread/9555a74cf7188ad2
>
> It's fixed in newer versions by commenting out the "TryExec", which
> (even if it works -- it doesn't for me when modifying my .desktop
> files by hand) is not very optimal, since then one has entries for
> window managers not really available in the system:
> https://github.com/Razor-qt/razor-qt/commit/bc8148c5e7741de9400f7436f188e178a51b5b96
I had thought that the above might be the problem, but I think now
that what I said above is wrong.
I think that the actual issue is the following one:
> I guess that this is a duplicate of #653327 , due to the following
> line having several arguments:
> Exec=razor-session -w openbox
#694832 and #566825 also seem duplicates of #653327 .
Sending a copy of this message to all of these bug reports, some of
them quite old; to see if submitters, triagers and maintainers concur
and we can get it fixed.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montezelo@gmail.com>
Reply to: