Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@debian.org> (24/06/2012): > Could you consider to use a more recent version of llvm ? We would like > to remove llvm 2.9 from the archive (we have three implementations). I'm pretty sure I'm not confident with last minute changes for mesa's build-depends. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature