[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#656719: [RFC] [PATCH v3 2/3] debian/control: libg3dvl-mesa: Depend on libxvmc1



Am Montag, den 25.06.2012, 08:55 +0200 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> On Son, 2012-06-24 at 18:02 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: 
> > 
> > This should be needed for the libxvmc1 interfaces to work. The VDPAU
> > libraries should work without `libxvmc1`.
> [...] 
> > diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> > index a9fcdd3..064cd29 100644
> > --- a/debian/control
> > +++ b/debian/control
> > @@ -809,6 +809,7 @@ Package: libg3dvl-mesa
> >  Section: libs
> >  Architecture: linux-any
> >  Depends:
> > + libxvmc1,
> >   ${shlibs:Depends},
> >   ${misc:Depends},
> >  Description: xvmc and vdpau Gallium3D video acceleration drivers
> 
> Doesn't ${shlibs:Depends} contain libxvmc1 and libvdpau1?

        $ LANG=C aptitude show libg3dvl-mesa
        Package: libg3dvl-mesa                   
        New: yes
        State: installed
        Automatically installed: no
        Version: 8.0.3-2
        Priority: optional
        Section: libs
        Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force <debian-x@lists.debian.org>
        Architecture: i386
        Uncompressed Size: 69.5 M
        Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.6-6~), libdrm-nouveau1a (>= 2.4.23), libdrm2 (>= 2.4.3), libffi5 (>= 3.0.4), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libstdc++6 (>=
                 4.6), libvdpau1 (>= 0.2), libx11-6 (>= 2:1.4.99.1), libxext6, libxfixes3, libxv1
        Description: xvmc and vdpau Gallium3D video acceleration drivers
         
        Homepage: http://mesa3d.sourceforge.net/

So without that change I only see `libxv1` and not `libxvmc1`. Am I
missing something?

> Which is BTW just one reason why I think separate packages for the VDPAU
> and XvMC functionality would make more sense.

Alright. I will respin this series. I welcome drafts for more elaborate
descriptions too. ;-)

Fabio, it would be great to hear your comments too.


Thanks,

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: