glw: Changes to 'debian-unstable'
New branch 'debian-unstable' available with the following commits:
commit c4749d6455fd194d3686b3ccae5e12634492fb40
Author: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
Date: Sat May 26 14:25:14 2012 +0200
Upload to unstable
commit ea18b5fd7003223a1c8401445fabf9c1c6412f46
Author: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
Date: Sat May 26 14:23:24 2012 +0200
Don't install private headers
commit 52ec0f61603801d88ea0107073d4463d95390306
Author: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>
Date: Wed May 23 18:29:49 2012 +0200
New upstream release
commit d7a1b2f19909c31f09b854e21a2b92edec567442
Merge: cd182dd 5df19cb
Author: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>
Date: Wed May 23 18:29:11 2012 +0200
Merge branch 'upstream-unstable' into debian-unstable
commit cd182dd26827d15126a16a8e859df9279d9ea7d4
Author: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>
Date: Thu May 17 17:07:49 2012 +0200
Add a debian/watch file
commit 83d2c244f40e548a95eb4fe9f81ee0b56fd5b40d
Author: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>
Date: Thu May 17 13:30:52 2012 +0200
Initial packaging of separate glw package
Notable user-visible differences to the libglw1-mesa{,-dev} packages
currently in Debian:
- Files under /usr/share/bug have been omitted, could be
reintroduced later if desired.
- The libglw1-mesa-dev package includes the two files
/usr/include/GL/GLw{M,}DrawAP.h which have so far been excluded
-- deliberately, but for reasons unknown to me.
- Package descriptions have been shortened, parts which described
Mesa were discarded.
- Dependency of libglw1-mesa-dev on mesa-common-dev has been made
unversioned, but to me it looks more correct to actually depend on
libgl1-mesa-dev | libgl-dev instead.
- debian/copyright has been rewritten from scratch in DEP5 syntax.
- Lintian error no-human-maintainers got introduced. Whoever fixes
this should add themselves or somebody else of their choice to
Uploaders, but not me!
- There is no debian/watch file since no upstream release has been
made yet, and I don't know where a release tarball will appear
when (or if) a release is made.
Reply to: