Bug#656893: xorg: Video corruption
On 22/01/12 01:32 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi.
Frank McCormick<beacon@videotron.ca> (22/01/2012):
Package: xorg
Version: 1:7.6+10
Severity: important
Since the last xorg update […]
Which packages got upgraded?
Aptitude 0.6.4: log report
Thu, Jan 19 2012 10:37:23 -0500
IMPORTANT: this log only lists intended actions; actions which fail due to
dpkg problems may not be completed.
Will install 22 packages, and remove 0 packages.
788 kB of disk space will be used
===============================================================================
[INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] linux-tools-3.2
[UPGRADE] abiword 2.9.2-1 -> 2.9.2-2
[UPGRADE] abiword-common 2.9.2-1 -> 2.9.2-2
[UPGRADE] bsdmainutils 8.2.3 -> 9.0.1
[UPGRADE] firmware-linux 0.34 -> 0.35
[UPGRADE] firmware-linux-nonfree 0.34 -> 0.35
[UPGRADE] libabiword-2.9 2.9.2-1 -> 2.9.2-2
[UPGRADE] libclutter-gst-1.0-0 1.4.4-1 -> 1.4.6-1
[UPGRADE] libgpod-common 0.8.2-4 -> 0.8.2-5
[UPGRADE] libgpod4 0.8.2-4 -> 0.8.2-5
[UPGRADE] libldap-2.4-2 2.4.28-1 -> 2.4.28-1.1
[UPGRADE] libpackagekit-glib2-14 0.7.2-1 -> 0.7.2-2
[UPGRADE] libpixman-1-0 0.24.0-1 -> 0.24.2-1
[UPGRADE] libpixman-1-dev 0.24.0-1 -> 0.24.2-1
[UPGRADE] libssl1.0.0 1.0.0f-1 -> 1.0.0g-1
[UPGRADE] linux-libc-dev 3.1.8-2 -> 3.2.1-1
[UPGRADE] linux-tools 3.1+41 -> 3.2+42
[UPGRADE] linux-tools-2.6 3.1+41 -> 3.2+42
[UPGRADE] openssl 1.0.0f-1 -> 1.0.0g-1
[UPGRADE] xserver-common 2:1.11.3.901-1 -> 2:1.11.3.901-2
[UPGRADE] xserver-xephyr 2:1.11.3.901-1 -> 2:1.11.3.901-2
[UPGRADE] xserver-xorg-core 2:1.11.3.901-1 -> 2:1.11.3.901-2
===============================================================================
Google-chrome: it affects the toolbar rendering it unreadable, but
a reload of the current page seems to clear it.
In Thunderbird it sometimes smears the text on the listing of messages.
What if you try to downgrade pixman to 0.24.0 (testing)? Make sure to
restart your session after that.
Done...but it happens only intermittently so I can't tell whether
libpixman is the culprit yet.
--
Cheers
Frank
Reply to: