[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#556762: marked as done (FTBFS with binutils-gold)

Your message dated Fri, 3 Jun 2011 00:13:05 +0200
with message-id <20110602221305.GD23990@mraw.org>
and subject line No longer reproducible
has caused the Debian Bug report #556762,
regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
556762: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556762
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: xterm
Version: 250-1
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzsche@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed

Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your executables.

More informations can be found at
 http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2009-11-02Packagesfailingbecausebinutils-gold.2BAC8-indirectlinking

/bin/sh ../plink.sh gcc -g -Wall -O2 -DDEF_ALLOW_FONT=False -DDEF_ALLOW_TCAP=False   -o xterm button.o cachedGCs.o charproc.o charsets.o cursor.o data.o doublechr.o fontutils.o input.o linedata.o main.o menu.o misc.o print.o ptydata.o scrollback.o screen.o scrollbar.o tabs.o util.o xstrings.o xtermcap.o VTPrsTbl.o TekPrsTbl.o Tekproc.o charclass.o precompose.o wcwidth.o -lXft   -lXaw -lXmu -lXext -lXt  -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lutempter  -ltermcap   
testing if -lXft is needed
...yes
testing if -lXaw is needed
...yes
testing if -lXmu is needed
...yes
testing if -lXext is needed
...yes
testing if -lXt is needed
...yes
testing if -lSM is needed
...yes
testing if -lICE is needed
...yes
testing if -lX11 is needed
...yes
testing if -lutempter is needed
...yes
testing if -ltermcap is needed
...yes
/usr/bin/ld: fontutils.o: in function xtermOpenXft:../fontutils.c:1607: error: undefined reference to 'FcPatternDestroy'
/usr/bin/ld: fontutils.o: in function checkXft:../fontutils.c:1577: error: undefined reference to 'FcCharSetHasChar'
/usr/bin/ld: fontutils.o: in function xtermComputeFontInfo:../fontutils.c:1829: error: undefined reference to 'FcPatternBuild'
/usr/bin/ld: fontutils.o: in function xtermComputeFontInfo:../fontutils.c:1835: error: undefined reference to 'FcPatternBuild'
/usr/bin/ld: fontutils.o: in function xtermComputeFontInfo:../fontutils.c:1863: error: undefined reference to 'FcPatternDestroy'
/usr/bin/ld: fontutils.o: in function xtermComputeFontInfo:../fontutils.c:1897: error: undefined reference to 'FcPatternBuild'
/usr/bin/ld: fontutils.o: in function xtermComputeFontInfo:../fontutils.c:1907: error: undefined reference to 'FcPatternBuild'
/usr/bin/ld: fontutils.o: in function xtermComputeFontInfo:../fontutils.c:1925: error: undefined reference to 'FcPatternDestroy'
/usr/bin/ld: fontutils.o: in function xtermComputeFontInfo:../fontutils.c:1863: error: undefined reference to 'FcPatternDestroy'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [xterm] Error 1

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 267-1

I'm unable to reproduce it in sid, while preparing 270-1. Looking at
the upstream branch, probably fixed/worked around in 267-1, closing
with that version.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: