Bug#613407: marked as done (libgl1-mesa-dri: mesa 7.10 should depend on libdrm 2.4.23)
Your message dated Sun, 4 Dec 2011 17:05:26 +0100
with message-id <20111204160526.GB3080@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#613407: libgl1-mesa-dri: mesa 7.10 should depend on libdrm 2.4.23
has caused the Debian Bug report #613407,
regarding libgl1-mesa-dri: mesa 7.10 should depend on libdrm 2.4.23
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
613407: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613407
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: libgl1-mesa-dri: mesa 7.10 should depend on libdrm 2.4.23
- From: Fredrik Tolf <fredrik@dolda2000.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:52:49 +0100
- Message-id: <20110214155249.8578.41122.reportbug@wolf.dolda2000.com>
Package: libgl1-mesa-dri
Version: 7.10-3
Severity: normal
I just installed mesa 7.10 (from unstable) on a testing system, and it seems
that it also needs libdrm 2.4.23, but it only depends on 2.4.21 (which is
what comes with testing).
With 2.4.21, all programs that used OpenGL hung before being able to render
anything at all. With 2.4.23, everything worked as expected. It should also
be noted that mesa 7.10 requires libdrm 2.4.23 to compile successfully, which
I guess is probably related.
This system uses the i965 driver in case it matters, which I guess it does. It
has an Arrandale chipset.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages libgl1-mesa-dri depends on:
ii libc6 2.11.2-10 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii libdrm-intel1 2.4.23-2 Userspace interface to intel-speci
ii libdrm-radeon1 2.4.23-2 Userspace interface to radeon-spec
ii libdrm2 2.4.23-2 Userspace interface to kernel DRM
ii libexpat1 2.0.1-7 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii libgcc1 1:4.4.5-10 GCC support library
ii libstdc++6 4.4.5-10 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libtalloc2 2.0.5-1 hierarchical pool based memory all
libgl1-mesa-dri recommends no packages.
Versions of packages libgl1-mesa-dri suggests:
pn libglide3 <none> (no description available)
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Fredrik Tolf <fredrik@dolda2000.com>, 613407-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#613407: libgl1-mesa-dri: mesa 7.10 should depend on libdrm 2.4.23
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 17:05:26 +0100
- Message-id: <20111204160526.GB3080@radis.cristau.org>
- In-reply-to: <20110214155249.8578.41122.reportbug@wolf.dolda2000.com>
- References: <20110214155249.8578.41122.reportbug@wolf.dolda2000.com>
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 16:52:49 +0100, Fredrik Tolf wrote:
> Package: libgl1-mesa-dri
> Version: 7.10-3
> Severity: normal
>
> I just installed mesa 7.10 (from unstable) on a testing system, and it seems
> that it also needs libdrm 2.4.23, but it only depends on 2.4.21 (which is
> what comes with testing).
>
> With 2.4.21, all programs that used OpenGL hung before being able to render
> anything at all. With 2.4.23, everything worked as expected. It should also
> be noted that mesa 7.10 requires libdrm 2.4.23 to compile successfully, which
> I guess is probably related.
>
> This system uses the i965 driver in case it matters, which I guess it does. It
> has an Arrandale chipset.
>
libgl1-mesa-dri now depends on libdrm-intel1 2.4.23, which should be
fine. Closing.
Cheers,
Julien
--- End Message ---
Reply to: