[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#615153: marked as done (exec: 58: /usr: Permission denied)

Your message dated Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:38:22 -0500
with message-id <20110425053822.GA27440@elie>
and subject line Re: exec: 58: /usr: Permission denied
has caused the Debian Bug report #615153,
regarding exec: 58: /usr: Permission denied
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

615153: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615153
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: exec: 58: /usr: Permission denied
Package: other
Severity: important


My problem happen after I did the distro upgrade... I pass 2 months out of my
debian distro, and I used the testing version (Squeeze), but I return yesterday
to my debian distro and the Squeeze becomes stable... so I did the change to
Debian testing again (now called Wheezy)... so I rename all my source packages
like this source.list:

# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 5.0.0 _Lenny_ - Official amd64 CD Binary-1
20090214-19:11]/ lenny main

# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 5.0.0 _Lenny_ - Official amd64 CD Binary-1
20090214-19:11]/ lenny main

#mirrors oficiais
deb http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main contrib non-free

#mirrors de segurança
deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free

#destinados para programas que lançam atualizações constantemente
#deb http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile squeeze/volatile main
#deb-src http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile squeeze/volatile main

#mirror multimídia
deb http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian-multimedia/ testing main
#deb http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org/debian testing main contrib non-free

#mirror wine:
#deb http://www.lamaresh.net/apt/ squeeze/main

So, I went to my Lxterminal and type: "sudo aptitude update". After I type:
"sudo aptitude safe-upgrade".

The system make a download of 839mb of data. Everything was made without any
errors reported... I not use any login manager... I do my login in getty and
after I start my X and window manager (fluxbox). So, when I restart my machine
and try to start my X with the command "startx", the system returns the error:
"xinit: connection to X server lost" and after said "Wait for X server to shut
down" and stayed with prompt flashing again. So, I tried invoke X with root and
I had sucess! When I went to the .xsession-errors I saw this error:

Xsession: X session started for invisiblemanguard at Ter Fev 22 16:36:02 BRT
exec: 58: /usr: Permission denied

Like the /usr couldn't be acess by a user... only root can... but I not change
any priority of the system... I only updated to wheezy... that's it... sorry
for my english... It not my mother tongue =/ ;)

Any doubt or question send me a e-mail!

Health and Sucess!

reportbug_version "4.12.6"
mode novice
ui gtk2
realname "Debian bug report"
email "invisiblemanguard-debianbugreport@yahoo.com.br"
header "X-Debbugs-CC: invisiblemanguard-debianbugreport@yahoo.com.br"
smtphost reportbug.debian.org

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-- no debconf information

Attachment: reportbug-reportbug-20110222-2912-0VkUC5
Description: Binary data

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Jonathan Nieder wrote:

> Another item that would be useful:

No response.  For the future: invisiblemanguard, I highly recommend

Sorry for the noise, all.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: