Re: [Xcb] planning to remove xprint, libxprintutil and related packages
- To: dparsons@debian.org
- Cc: debian-devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>, debian-x <debian-x@lists.debian.org>, xcb@lists.freedesktop.org, pkg-mozilla-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [Xcb] planning to remove xprint, libxprintutil and related packages
- From: Julien Danjou <julien@danjou.info>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:22:17 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87wrin65wm.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org>
- Mail-followup-to: dparsons@debian.org, debian-devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>, debian-x <debian-x@lists.debian.org>, xcb@lists.freedesktop.org, pkg-mozilla-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1303388103.17301.30.camel@pug> (Drew Parsons's message of "Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:15:03 +1000")
- References: <[🔎] 1303388103.17301.30.camel@pug>
On Thu, Apr 21 2011, Drew Parsons wrote:
> cc: xcb maintainers: should you keep libxcb-xprint0 ? Do we need to talk
> about this? libxcb-xprint0 has no relation (in a packaging sense) to
> xprint.
I see no harm providing it. It exists, so we can just let it be. Nothing
depends on it I guess, and nothing should ever depends on it, but I
don't see any good reason not to build it either.
If you really want to hide that Xprint ever existed, maybe that'd be a
reason to stop building that package, otherwise, I don't see really any.
:)
--
Julien Danjou
❱ http://julien.danjou.info
Attachment:
pgpTseGLgEZ0w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: