libxfixes: Changes to 'refs/tags/libxfixes-1_5.0-1'
Tag 'libxfixes-1_5.0-1' created by Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> at 2011-03-08 23:09 +0000
Tagging upload of libxfixes 1:5.0-1 to experimental.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAk12tysACgkQeGfVPHR5Nd0peQCdEtyLJL4qdkMdcG0kuMNPRgGp
AwcAoIkuPnHiEanYxewNtvzv2zB0qpCF
=FDHo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Changes since libxfixes-1_4.0.5-1:
Adam Jackson (1):
libXfixes v5: Pointer barriers
Cyril Brulebois (17):
Mention upstream git URL in a comment.
Add debian/libxfixes3.symbols file.
Pass -c4 to dh_makeshlibs to ensure updates are noticed.
Merge branch 'upstream-unstable' into debian-unstable
Bump changelogs.
Update symbols file, and bump shlibs for new symbols.
Bump x11proto-fixes-dev build-dep accordingly.
Bump x11proto-fixes-dev dependency for libxfixes3-dev.
Wrap Depends fields.
Install manpages through dh_install.
Use --fail-missing instead of --list-missing in dh_install for additional safety.
Switch to dh.
Remove xsfbs accordingly.
Update Uploaders list. Thanks, David!
Add a placeholder series file.
Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.1 (no changes needed).
Upload to experimental.
Fernando Carrijo (1):
Purge macros NEED_EVENTS and NEED_REPLIES
Gaetan Nadon (3):
config: remove AC_PROG_CC as it overrides AC_PROG_C_C99
config: replace deprecated AM_CONFIG_HEADER with AC_CONFIG_HEADERS
config: comment, minor upgrade, quote and layout configure.ac
---
ChangeLog | 61 +++
configure.ac | 98 +++---
debian/README.source | 24 -
debian/changelog | 25 +
debian/compat | 2
debian/control | 29 +
debian/libxfixes-dev.install | 1
debian/libxfixes-dev.manpages | 1
debian/libxfixes3.symbols | 39 ++
debian/patches/series | 1
debian/rules | 103 ------
debian/watch | 1
debian/xsfbs/repack.sh | 32 --
debian/xsfbs/xsfbs.mk | 285 ------------------
debian/xsfbs/xsfbs.sh | 622 ----------------------------------------
include/X11/extensions/Xfixes.h | 15
src/Cursor.c | 60 +++
src/Xfixesint.h | 2
18 files changed, 288 insertions(+), 1113 deletions(-)
---
Reply to: