[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#140229: marked as done (xdm: /etc/init.d/xdm calls itself)

Your message dated Sun, 6 Mar 2011 01:37:40 +0100
with message-id <20110306003740.GA29049@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#140229: xdm: /etc/init.d/xdm calls itself
has caused the Debian Bug report #140229,
regarding xdm: /etc/init.d/xdm calls itself
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
140229: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=140229
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: xdm
Version: 4.1.0-14
Severity: minor


There are several calls litterally to "/etc/init.d/xdm" in this file.
Shouldn't it be replaced by "$0"?
Is there any reason not to do it?

Thanks and sorry for disturbing you.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux apollon 2.4.16-686 #1 Wed Nov 28 09:27:17 EST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE

Versions of packages xdm depends on:
ii  cpp                           2:2.95.4-9 The GNU C preprocessor.
ii  debconf                       1.0.26     Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                         2.2.5-3    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libpam0g                      0.72-35    Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libxaw7                       4.1.0-14   X Athena widget set library
ii  xbase-clients                 4.1.0-14   miscellaneous X clients
ii  xlibs                         4.1.0-14   X Window System client libraries

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

Jerome Warnier <jwarnier@bxlug.be> (28/03/2002):
> There are several calls litterally to "/etc/init.d/xdm" in this file.
> Shouldn't it be replaced by "$0"?

Why?

> Is there any reason not to do it?

Any reason to do it?

Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org> (02/03/2007):
> tags 140229 wontfix

Since I'm not sure what good it would buy us, I'm OK with Brice's
point of view, and even closing this bug report instead of keeping
open/wontfix forever.

KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: