[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#394529: xorg.conf(5): Please mention APM/ACPI in NoPM option



tag 394529 upstream
thanks

Hi,

Julien Viard de Galbert <julien@vdg.blogsite.org> (09/11/2010):
> Thanks for your suggestion, anyway as there is currently so many
> bugs on xorg packages it is unlikely it will be addressed any time
> soon...

that's an easy one, though. :)

> Maybe you can provide a patch with a nice phrasing ?
> 
> Also I know xorg uses ACPI but I'm not sure whether it still uses APM.

Just for the record, to check what happens with this option:
| $ git grep NoPM
| → FLAG_NOPM
| $ git grep FLAG_NOPM
| → pmFlag
| $ git grep -l pmFlag|grep os-support
| hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/bsd_apm.c
| hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/bsd_kqueue_apm.c
| hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_acpi.c
| hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_apm.c
| hw/xfree86/os-support/solaris/sun_apm.c

I'd go for just adding “(like ACPI, APM)” in that sentence. To submit
patches upstream:
  http://www.x.org/wiki/Development/Documentation/SubmittingPatches

Feel free to put the bug in cc of the patches you submit upstream.

KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: