[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#558875: marked as done (Resolve unresolved symbols in shared libraries)



Your message dated Sun, 04 Apr 2010 16:50:44 +0000
with message-id <E1NyT24-0003Is-JO@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#558875: fixed in libcompizconfig 0.8.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #558875,
regarding Resolve unresolved symbols in shared libraries
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
558875: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=558875
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libcompizconfig
Version: 0.8.2-2
Severity: wishlist
User: peter.fritzsche@gmx.de
Usertags: unresolved-symbols-so

I build all packages some time ago with binutils-gold and your package build
without an hard failure, but I noticed that you seems to provide a library in
a specific library package so other packages can link against it without
problems.... but your shared object has still some unresolved symbols which
the program which links agaomst it must resolve. This isnt a good idea because
when you introduce new dependencies the package previously linked against the
old version will break because it doesnt know about the new dependency.
Maybe you could link against all needed libraries so programs must not link
against libraries which it doesnt need to use.

Maybe it is related to following bugs which hard failed due to unresolved
symbols in programs
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=peter.fritzsche@gmx.de;tag=no-add-needed

More informations can be found at
 http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2009-11-02Packagesfailingbecausebinutils-gold.2BAC8-indirectlinking
dpkg-shlibdeps already showed you the related warnings:

dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlsym used by debian/libcompizconfig0/usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 found in none of the libraries.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol pthread_once used by debian/libcompizconfig0/usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 found in none of the libraries.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlclose used by debian/libcompizconfig0/usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 found in none of the libraries.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlopen used by debian/libcompizconfig0/usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 found in none of the libraries.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlerror used by debian/libcompizconfig0/usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 found in none of the libraries.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libcompizconfig
Source-Version: 0.8.4-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libcompizconfig, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libcompizconfig-dev_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb
  to main/libc/libcompizconfig/libcompizconfig-dev_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb
libcompizconfig0_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb
  to main/libc/libcompizconfig/libcompizconfig0_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb
libcompizconfig_0.8.4-2.diff.gz
  to main/libc/libcompizconfig/libcompizconfig_0.8.4-2.diff.gz
libcompizconfig_0.8.4-2.dsc
  to main/libc/libcompizconfig/libcompizconfig_0.8.4-2.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 558875@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> (supplier of updated libcompizconfig package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 18:25:06 +0200
Source: libcompizconfig
Binary: libcompizconfig-dev libcompizconfig0
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.8.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force <debian-x@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
Description: 
 libcompizconfig-dev - Configuration settings library for compiz-fusion - development fi
 libcompizconfig0 - Configuration settings library for compiz-fusion
Closes: 558875
Changes: 
 libcompizconfig (0.8.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Medium urgency to fix RC bug in testing.
   * Disable protobuf to work around #572923.
   * Link libcompizconfig with -ldl (closes: #558875)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 6886aacbb3dac7de9525c58a0edede729eb5f111 1992 libcompizconfig_0.8.4-2.dsc
 e7947c536f5569b8323d6c3e69d75a436f772521 4110 libcompizconfig_0.8.4-2.diff.gz
 e6485e177d650c2d5fbabb52a4fc4f48bf7f1ccf 60882 libcompizconfig-dev_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb
 b21f977b47959ba93a37dbb4b7d9e1ad7fcffc2e 55114 libcompizconfig0_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 cd3c70f987755242c7ac7f8b5572be8b443fa1d806ce60a49d1507699b0fc3ed 1992 libcompizconfig_0.8.4-2.dsc
 dde2a953c0637c5b16df337a55076296cb3f425e1ac4ce329ae423201dd66e5a 4110 libcompizconfig_0.8.4-2.diff.gz
 8e24385e7f0f0002899bd2104b473118e4acda664851eb6e87b66be6bd8fd43a 60882 libcompizconfig-dev_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb
 b39bd712a9cbc0e96209bcc35208ac59ad7d9636d1748cfbcfb80257b727e99e 55114 libcompizconfig0_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb
Files: 
 17524378ce7a5cc31c2e64d2a9058301 1992 libs extra libcompizconfig_0.8.4-2.dsc
 262c48fa3c58e43c7dce846bfc2a2d1b 4110 libs extra libcompizconfig_0.8.4-2.diff.gz
 44e5a67ea6c1e68744f9cd78c97beb5c 60882 libdevel extra libcompizconfig-dev_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb
 89c60de60fc773f49f13033c6c02f118 55114 libs extra libcompizconfig0_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=gGyH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply to: